Static content ...
Static content ...
If one purpose of VFRDiscussion.nl is to be a reference for everything VF(R) for the aftertime, I suppose it might be considered to organize it with a static section with various static content (e.g. historic line up, manuals, brochures, articles, DIY instructions, links to other references) and a dynamic section (forum, chat and whatever of that sort). That might be a more robust (and archive.org friendly) concept. If both VFRDiscussion and VFRWorld goes under, I will feel effing alone if I need to troubleshoot my old lady.
Re: Static content ...
I feel alone already having lost the original VFRD community!
Re: Static content ...
Me too.Presson wrote: Mon Jun 01, 2026 6:46 pm I feel alone already having lost the original VFRD community!
Re: Static content ...
I would be happy to exploit the possibilities for 'static content'. I really like the idea!
Personally, I think making it work in phpBB is the smallest effort (and a one-time effort).
The main effort is creating/providing this 'static content', I am guessing...
(and yes, still in the mourning phase I suppose)
Personally, I think making it work in phpBB is the smallest effort (and a one-time effort).
The main effort is creating/providing this 'static content', I am guessing...
(and yes, still in the mourning phase I suppose)